| The Card Grading Page! |
1954 Topps #1 Ted Williams 1953 Bowman Color # Gus Zernial
"How do I grade my cards?" This is a very common question. So on this page I will attempt to help you grade your own cards. It is not difficult and by grading your own cards you
not only will save yourself money (sending cards to a reputable grading service will cost you roughly $8 to $10 dollars per card or more!) but also by determining a card's grade, you can
also determine it's value (important when buying or selling cards). So let's begin!
not only will save yourself money (sending cards to a reputable grading service will cost you roughly $8 to $10 dollars per card or more!) but also by determining a card's grade, you can
also determine it's value (important when buying or selling cards). So let's begin!
1948 Bowman lot of baseball cards in lesser grade (including
Johnny Mize and Pete Reiser).Note the tape stains, creasing, and
even a hole on one of the cards.
Johnny Mize and Pete Reiser).Note the tape stains, creasing, and
even a hole on one of the cards.
Baseball card collectors have their own lingo for grading. Basically there are different grades ranging from POOR (lowest grade) to MINT(highest grade a baseball card can attain). Most
vintage cards (pre-1980's) will rarely be in strict MINT condition. In fact, most vintage cards are usually found in mid to lower grades. The most common grades from lowest to highest
would be POOR (PR), VERY GOOD (VG), EXCELLENT (EX), NEAR MINT (NM). Like I stated before, most vintage cards will not be in MINT condition even right out of the pack! Why?
There are numerous reasons. One, most card manufacturers were not high on quality control. Many cards were cut off-center by the factory. Many were even mis-cut and printing
defects are common also. A MINT card can have none of these flaws. Plus the fact that most vintage cards were handled at some point (usually by kids), traded, flipped, etc. which
resulted in normal wear and tear on a card. So vintage cards got off to a rough start to begin with.
Being that each card is not exactly the same, there are in-between grades. For instance some cards might be not fall into the POOR category but would not grade as high as VERY
GOOD (VG) either. So what grade would you assign it? Fortunately this has already been worked out for you. So here are all the grades a typical vintage card would be assigned:
POOR (PR), FAIR (FR), GOOD (GD), VERY GOOD (VG), VERY GOOD TO EXCELLENT (VG-EX), EXCELLENT (EX), EXCELLENT TO MINT (EX-MT or EX/NM), NEAR MINT (NM),
and MINT (MT). These grades are universally accepted as hobby "standards" of grading. They are listed in most hobby publications such as Becketts, or Sports Collectors Digest
Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards. In fact if you have not already done so, it would be wise to purchase a current copy of the SCD Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards (published
yearly by Krause Publications) or Beckett's yearly Baseball Card Price Guide. I prefer the SCD Catalog myself as #1) it lists more issues and is more comprehensive, and #2) the prices
quoted in the SCD Catalog are a bit more realistic than the prices listed by Becketts. You can buy this huge volume at the bookstore and they are also available online (Amazon.com,
etc.) Retails for about $25. Are you with me so far? Good.
vintage cards (pre-1980's) will rarely be in strict MINT condition. In fact, most vintage cards are usually found in mid to lower grades. The most common grades from lowest to highest
would be POOR (PR), VERY GOOD (VG), EXCELLENT (EX), NEAR MINT (NM). Like I stated before, most vintage cards will not be in MINT condition even right out of the pack! Why?
There are numerous reasons. One, most card manufacturers were not high on quality control. Many cards were cut off-center by the factory. Many were even mis-cut and printing
defects are common also. A MINT card can have none of these flaws. Plus the fact that most vintage cards were handled at some point (usually by kids), traded, flipped, etc. which
resulted in normal wear and tear on a card. So vintage cards got off to a rough start to begin with.
Being that each card is not exactly the same, there are in-between grades. For instance some cards might be not fall into the POOR category but would not grade as high as VERY
GOOD (VG) either. So what grade would you assign it? Fortunately this has already been worked out for you. So here are all the grades a typical vintage card would be assigned:
POOR (PR), FAIR (FR), GOOD (GD), VERY GOOD (VG), VERY GOOD TO EXCELLENT (VG-EX), EXCELLENT (EX), EXCELLENT TO MINT (EX-MT or EX/NM), NEAR MINT (NM),
and MINT (MT). These grades are universally accepted as hobby "standards" of grading. They are listed in most hobby publications such as Becketts, or Sports Collectors Digest
Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards. In fact if you have not already done so, it would be wise to purchase a current copy of the SCD Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards (published
yearly by Krause Publications) or Beckett's yearly Baseball Card Price Guide. I prefer the SCD Catalog myself as #1) it lists more issues and is more comprehensive, and #2) the prices
quoted in the SCD Catalog are a bit more realistic than the prices listed by Becketts. You can buy this huge volume at the bookstore and they are also available online (Amazon.com,
etc.) Retails for about $25. Are you with me so far? Good.
Let's get familiar with the price guide first. I am going to use my (outdated) 2006 Sports Collector's Digest Standard Catalog Of Baseball Cards for reference. The SCD Catalog lists cards
in two sections. The first section is Vintage cards (up to 1980), while the second half is dedicated to Modern baseball cards (1981 and up). The cards are first listed alphabetically, by
ISSUE (or card manufacturer). Ok so you have a card. Who made the card? Usually there will be some sort of identification on the card back. Topps baseball cards, for instance, have a
T.C.C.G. or T.C.G. (Topps Chewing Gum) identification on the card backs and sometimes by the card number you will see "Topps" as well. The number on the card back is also a helpful
reference. Not only does it identify the number of that series, you can use the number to easily look up the card in the price guide. For instance, say you have a wood bordered card and
you don't know what year it is. So you turn the card over and in small print it says "T.C.G. Printed In U.S.A." (Topps Chewing Gum). So you know you have a TOPPS card. Now what year
is it? A good clue is to look at the statistics. Look at the last year of statistics. In this case, the most current statistics are for the year "1961." Notice that while it does not mention "1961," it
DOES show that Maris hit 61 home runs (look under "HR" underneath "Major League Batting Record"). So is this a 1961 Topps card? NO. The cards are produced the following season
so what you are looking at is a 1962 Topps card. Let's say the card number is #1 and the player is Roger Maris. So let's check the SCD Catalog and see what it says. Ok, I found
"Topps," went to "1962" and listed as the #1 card is ROGER MARIS. So now I know this is a 1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris card. There is also a picture of a 1962 Topps card and it is
similar to the Maris card so that checks. Underneath the card picture is a detailed biography of the 1962 Topps cards. It will state the card size, features, and highlights of the set. Then it
will list every card in numerical order. The SCD Catalog lists three different prices for three different grades (NM, EX, VG). Let's check out the prices of the #1 Maris card. Ok,, the three
prices are "NM $230.00, EX $75.00, and VG $40.00. So now you have to determine condition. Here is an ungraded 1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris. Let's see if we can assign it a grade.
in two sections. The first section is Vintage cards (up to 1980), while the second half is dedicated to Modern baseball cards (1981 and up). The cards are first listed alphabetically, by
ISSUE (or card manufacturer). Ok so you have a card. Who made the card? Usually there will be some sort of identification on the card back. Topps baseball cards, for instance, have a
T.C.C.G. or T.C.G. (Topps Chewing Gum) identification on the card backs and sometimes by the card number you will see "Topps" as well. The number on the card back is also a helpful
reference. Not only does it identify the number of that series, you can use the number to easily look up the card in the price guide. For instance, say you have a wood bordered card and
you don't know what year it is. So you turn the card over and in small print it says "T.C.G. Printed In U.S.A." (Topps Chewing Gum). So you know you have a TOPPS card. Now what year
is it? A good clue is to look at the statistics. Look at the last year of statistics. In this case, the most current statistics are for the year "1961." Notice that while it does not mention "1961," it
DOES show that Maris hit 61 home runs (look under "HR" underneath "Major League Batting Record"). So is this a 1961 Topps card? NO. The cards are produced the following season
so what you are looking at is a 1962 Topps card. Let's say the card number is #1 and the player is Roger Maris. So let's check the SCD Catalog and see what it says. Ok, I found
"Topps," went to "1962" and listed as the #1 card is ROGER MARIS. So now I know this is a 1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris card. There is also a picture of a 1962 Topps card and it is
similar to the Maris card so that checks. Underneath the card picture is a detailed biography of the 1962 Topps cards. It will state the card size, features, and highlights of the set. Then it
will list every card in numerical order. The SCD Catalog lists three different prices for three different grades (NM, EX, VG). Let's check out the prices of the #1 Maris card. Ok,, the three
prices are "NM $230.00, EX $75.00, and VG $40.00. So now you have to determine condition. Here is an ungraded 1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris. Let's see if we can assign it a grade.
1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris (front)
1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris (back view). Note the "T.C.G. Printed In U.S.A." identification
(Topps Chewing Gum) above the "Major League Batting Record."
(Topps Chewing Gum) above the "Major League Batting Record."
Ok, so here is our 1962 Topps #1 Roger Maris baseball card. Let's start with the front, which is really the most important part of the card. The card is intact. There are no pieces missing
and I do not see any tears or creasing. I DO notice right away there are a series of print lines (remember I talked about printing defects earlier?) on the front of the card to the left of
Maris. This is a printing defect and it does affect the value and grade of a card. So we have a print defect. Also you will notice the borders are not centered (very typical for this issue and
for most Topps cards period). The border on the left and bottom are much larger than the top and right borders. This is referred to as centering. This card is noticeably off-center. Now
look at the corners. A new card will have four sharp corners that come to points. This card has obviously been handled as the corners do not come to points, but are "rounded." You can
see white on the ends of the corners and along the card edges. This is from wear. A NEAR MINT (NM) 1962 Topps card will have minimal, if any, wear on the corners and edges. You
won't see much white at all. Also I should mention that #1 cards (as well as the last card in a set) usually were susceptible to the most wear. Why? Because back then kids would collect
cards, sort them in number order, put a rubber band around them and stuff them in a shoe box. So the card on top (usually card #1) and the last card in the set (bottom of the deck)
would get the most wear. Ok, let's check out the card back. The back is intact, with no missing paper or creases. Keep in mind that creases are sometimes hard to see. You may have to
hold the card at an angle in good light to see any. Creases can range from "light" to "heavy." I see no creases. The centering is actually better on the back of the card, but technically the
centering on the front is the most important. So what grade am I going to assign this card? I am now going to refer to my handy dandy SCD Catalog.
At the beginning of the book is a Chapter called "HOW TO USE THIS BOOK." Read it! It has some valuable information for you. But for now we are going to "GRADING." (Pg. 14 in the
2006 Edition). While the price guide part of the book lists just 3 typical grades (NM, EX, VG), the GRADING section lists all of the grades: Mint (MT), Near Mint/Mint (NM/M), Near Mint
(NM), Excellent (EX), Very Good (VG), Good (GD), Fair (F or Fr.), and POOR (P). It also mentions that there are intermediate grades (VG-EX, EX-MT, for example). It also lists a detailed
explanation for each grade. For instance, for the definition of an Excellent condition card, the SCD Catalog reads:
"Excellent (EX): Corners are still fairly sharp with only moderate wear. Card borders may be off-center as much as 80-20. No creases. May have very minor gum, wax, or
product stains, front or back. Surfaces may show slight loss of luster from rubbing across other cards."
Ok. I know this Maris card does not have fairly sharp corners. It is off centered and there are no creases. It also does show surface wear. So I know this card is not EX. So I need to go to
the next lower grade and read what it says:
"Very Good (VG): Show obvious handling. Corners rounded and/ or perhaps showing minor creases. Other minor creases may be visible. Surfaces may exhibit loss of luster,
but all printing is intact. May show major gum, wax, or other packaging stains. No major creases, tape marks, or extraneous markings or writing. All four borders visible,
though the ratio may be as poor as 95/5. Exhibits honest wear."
Well that definition seems to fit my Maris a bit better than the EX grade. The Maris card does not have any creases however, the centering is better than 95/5, and there is no staining.
However there is corner rounding and the card does exhibit honest wear. While it does not have any creases, it does have the print defect, which to me, is even more noticeable than a
crease. As such I am comfortable grading this card VERY GOOD (VG). To be sure let's go down one grade lower:
"Good (G): A well-worn cards, but exhibits no intentional damage or abuse. May have major or multiple creases and/or corners rounded well beyond the border. A Good card
will generally sell for about 50% the value of a card in Very Good condition." Keep in mind that the price guide lists prices for only NM, EX, and VG. So to figure the price of a card
graded GOOD you would take fifty percent of the VG price. In this case, the Maris lists at $40 in VG. So a Maris in GD condition would sell for approx. $20.
Now I think this Maris is better than GOOD and fits more in the VG category. Now there is an in-between grade, in this case VG-EX. A VG-EX card would be slightly better than a VG card,
but not as high as an EX card. In general, any creases, light or heavy would lower the cards' grade to no better than VG-EX. In other words an EX condition card can have no creases
while a light crease could be found on a VG-EX card. But with this Maris card I would not grade it as high as VG-EX, but I would be comfortable assigning it a VG grade. If the card had
creases I would even lower it to GOOD (GD). But it's certainly not a POOR or FAIR card. And it's certainly not EX or better. Got it? It takes practice, but once you familiarize yourself with
the grading scale and familiarize yourself with the cards themselves you will be able to grade your own cards rather quickly.
Let's try some practice again. We will refer back to our first group of cards, the black and white cards at the top of this page:
and I do not see any tears or creasing. I DO notice right away there are a series of print lines (remember I talked about printing defects earlier?) on the front of the card to the left of
Maris. This is a printing defect and it does affect the value and grade of a card. So we have a print defect. Also you will notice the borders are not centered (very typical for this issue and
for most Topps cards period). The border on the left and bottom are much larger than the top and right borders. This is referred to as centering. This card is noticeably off-center. Now
look at the corners. A new card will have four sharp corners that come to points. This card has obviously been handled as the corners do not come to points, but are "rounded." You can
see white on the ends of the corners and along the card edges. This is from wear. A NEAR MINT (NM) 1962 Topps card will have minimal, if any, wear on the corners and edges. You
won't see much white at all. Also I should mention that #1 cards (as well as the last card in a set) usually were susceptible to the most wear. Why? Because back then kids would collect
cards, sort them in number order, put a rubber band around them and stuff them in a shoe box. So the card on top (usually card #1) and the last card in the set (bottom of the deck)
would get the most wear. Ok, let's check out the card back. The back is intact, with no missing paper or creases. Keep in mind that creases are sometimes hard to see. You may have to
hold the card at an angle in good light to see any. Creases can range from "light" to "heavy." I see no creases. The centering is actually better on the back of the card, but technically the
centering on the front is the most important. So what grade am I going to assign this card? I am now going to refer to my handy dandy SCD Catalog.
At the beginning of the book is a Chapter called "HOW TO USE THIS BOOK." Read it! It has some valuable information for you. But for now we are going to "GRADING." (Pg. 14 in the
2006 Edition). While the price guide part of the book lists just 3 typical grades (NM, EX, VG), the GRADING section lists all of the grades: Mint (MT), Near Mint/Mint (NM/M), Near Mint
(NM), Excellent (EX), Very Good (VG), Good (GD), Fair (F or Fr.), and POOR (P). It also mentions that there are intermediate grades (VG-EX, EX-MT, for example). It also lists a detailed
explanation for each grade. For instance, for the definition of an Excellent condition card, the SCD Catalog reads:
"Excellent (EX): Corners are still fairly sharp with only moderate wear. Card borders may be off-center as much as 80-20. No creases. May have very minor gum, wax, or
product stains, front or back. Surfaces may show slight loss of luster from rubbing across other cards."
Ok. I know this Maris card does not have fairly sharp corners. It is off centered and there are no creases. It also does show surface wear. So I know this card is not EX. So I need to go to
the next lower grade and read what it says:
"Very Good (VG): Show obvious handling. Corners rounded and/ or perhaps showing minor creases. Other minor creases may be visible. Surfaces may exhibit loss of luster,
but all printing is intact. May show major gum, wax, or other packaging stains. No major creases, tape marks, or extraneous markings or writing. All four borders visible,
though the ratio may be as poor as 95/5. Exhibits honest wear."
Well that definition seems to fit my Maris a bit better than the EX grade. The Maris card does not have any creases however, the centering is better than 95/5, and there is no staining.
However there is corner rounding and the card does exhibit honest wear. While it does not have any creases, it does have the print defect, which to me, is even more noticeable than a
crease. As such I am comfortable grading this card VERY GOOD (VG). To be sure let's go down one grade lower:
"Good (G): A well-worn cards, but exhibits no intentional damage or abuse. May have major or multiple creases and/or corners rounded well beyond the border. A Good card
will generally sell for about 50% the value of a card in Very Good condition." Keep in mind that the price guide lists prices for only NM, EX, and VG. So to figure the price of a card
graded GOOD you would take fifty percent of the VG price. In this case, the Maris lists at $40 in VG. So a Maris in GD condition would sell for approx. $20.
Now I think this Maris is better than GOOD and fits more in the VG category. Now there is an in-between grade, in this case VG-EX. A VG-EX card would be slightly better than a VG card,
but not as high as an EX card. In general, any creases, light or heavy would lower the cards' grade to no better than VG-EX. In other words an EX condition card can have no creases
while a light crease could be found on a VG-EX card. But with this Maris card I would not grade it as high as VG-EX, but I would be comfortable assigning it a VG grade. If the card had
creases I would even lower it to GOOD (GD). But it's certainly not a POOR or FAIR card. And it's certainly not EX or better. Got it? It takes practice, but once you familiarize yourself with
the grading scale and familiarize yourself with the cards themselves you will be able to grade your own cards rather quickly.
Let's try some practice again. We will refer back to our first group of cards, the black and white cards at the top of this page:
Ok. Now I have put in the caption above that these are 1948 Bowman baseball cards. What if you didn't know? The backs of these cards have biographies but no statistics like the
Topps cards. However on the card backs there is a "BOWMAN GUM, INC. Copyright 1948." Does this help? It sure does. That line identifies the 1948 Bowman baseball cards. This was
the first year Bowman produced baseball cards. They were the major competitor for Topps when Topps started it's first major set in 1952. They are also easily recognizable as they are
the only black & white issue besides the 1953 Bowman Black & White issue, which was a much larger issue than these 2-1/16" x 2-1/2" cards. To be sure, I am going to check the back of
the Mize card, which is card #4. Then I am going to the SCD Catalog and look under "BOWMAN" and sure enough, the first year was 1948. There is a card picture of a 1948 Bowman
card and it sure looks like my cards. So I look at card #4 Johnny Mize and sure enough, it checks. So I have here, four cards from the 1948 Bowman set.
Now note the various conditions of the 4 cards. Obviously none of these cards are going to be MINT, NM, or even EX for that matter. The top left card has tape stains but no creasing,
while the other three cards have noticeable heavy creasing. The card on the bottom right has a small hole in it right above the player's wrist. So what would I grade these cards?
Let's start from left to right. I am only going to grade these based on the card fronts to simplify things. Plus the fronts are the most important anyway as they have the pictures of course!
Look at the Johnny Mize card (top left). What is the first thing you notice. For me, the first thing I notice is the player and I happen to know that is Hall of Famer Johnny Mize. But almost
as obvious in the tape stains. This card was probably pasted on a wall or scrapbook at some time. The tape probably came off easy with time; however it did leave heavy tape stains on
the card front. The centering is off, but not that bad. Most vintage cards are off center to some degree. There are no creases on this card. However the tape stains would bring the
card's grade down substantially. In referring back to the GRADING section of the SCD Catalog, I know that card is not as bad as POOR ("A card that has been tortured to death"), but in
reading the next grade up (FAIR) it reads: "evidence of having been taped or pasted." There is our card right there. However the card does not exhibit some of the other
characteristics of a FAIR card such as "heavy creases, minor writing, or missing small bits of paper." So could this card fit into a FAIR/GOOD (FR-GD) category? Possibly. For sure a
card with such heavy tape stains would grade no better than GOOD (GD). But being that this Mize card is much nicer than a FAIR (FR) card (in fact without the tape stains you could call
this card EX) you could call this either FAIR or FR-GD. It is slightly better than FAIR but not better than GOOD. As such I would grade this card FR-GD. To be conservative, you would
grade it as simply FAIR. So how much would the card be worth? Well the VG price for card #4 Johnny Mize is $27.50. It says under the GRADING section on page 14, that "FAIR cards
are valued at about 50% of Good. Good condition cards are valued at about 50% of the VG price. So there is our formula. Let's say we call the Mize card FAIR. So we take 50% of the
VG price ($27.50) and that will give us the GOOD price ($13.75). Fair cards are 50% of GOOD so that means our Mize is worth approx. $6.75. Now Mize is a Hall of Famer and like i said
it is possible to call it FR-GD. So to do that I would have to figure a price in-between FAIR and GOOD. So if my GD price is $13.75 and FR price is $6.75, the difference is exactly $7.
Divide that in half ($3.50) and add that to my FR price ($6.75). The total for my FR-GD Johnny Mize is now $10.25. Which to me seems very fair for this card.
Next, the card on the top right. It is Dodger great Pete Reiser, card #7 in the series. It also happens to be considered Reiser's rookie card AND it is a short printed card, which means
there were less cards of Reiser printed than other cards in the set. Centering is noticeably off especially the top border. There is just a tiny border at the top. Also notice the heavy
crease which runs horizontally through the card. It actually breaks the paper on the card surface. What would I grade it? Well a VG card by definition can have "no major creases."
"Centering can be as poor as 95/5." Yes we have the poor centering but we have a major crease, so the card could not be called a VG card. How about GD? "A well-worn card, but
exhibits no intentional damage or abuse. May have major or multiple creases and/or corners rounded well beyond the border." So I would grade this card as GOOD (GD). You could also
make a case for GD-VG but we will be conservative and stick with GOOD (GD). Value? Again, a GD card is valued at approx. 50% of the VG price. Looking at card #7 Pete Reiser in the
price guide I see that the VG price is $45. Half of that would be $22.50, so our Pete Reiser card is worth approx. $22.50. Why is the Reiser card worth more than the Johnny Mize card,
even though Mize is a Hall of Famer? Two letters: SP (Short print). The SCD Catalog makes a notation (SP) for short printed cards. Rookie cards are in italics.
Quickly I am going to grade the bottom two cards. The card on the lower left- GOOD (GD). However the card on the bottom right has a small hole and as such could be graded no higher
than POOR. POOR cards are easy to grade. Just remember "A card that has been tortured to death." If it has holes, rips, tears, bite marks, pieces missing, you have a POOR condition
card on your hands. I've seen worse.
Let's try another one:
Topps cards. However on the card backs there is a "BOWMAN GUM, INC. Copyright 1948." Does this help? It sure does. That line identifies the 1948 Bowman baseball cards. This was
the first year Bowman produced baseball cards. They were the major competitor for Topps when Topps started it's first major set in 1952. They are also easily recognizable as they are
the only black & white issue besides the 1953 Bowman Black & White issue, which was a much larger issue than these 2-1/16" x 2-1/2" cards. To be sure, I am going to check the back of
the Mize card, which is card #4. Then I am going to the SCD Catalog and look under "BOWMAN" and sure enough, the first year was 1948. There is a card picture of a 1948 Bowman
card and it sure looks like my cards. So I look at card #4 Johnny Mize and sure enough, it checks. So I have here, four cards from the 1948 Bowman set.
Now note the various conditions of the 4 cards. Obviously none of these cards are going to be MINT, NM, or even EX for that matter. The top left card has tape stains but no creasing,
while the other three cards have noticeable heavy creasing. The card on the bottom right has a small hole in it right above the player's wrist. So what would I grade these cards?
Let's start from left to right. I am only going to grade these based on the card fronts to simplify things. Plus the fronts are the most important anyway as they have the pictures of course!
Look at the Johnny Mize card (top left). What is the first thing you notice. For me, the first thing I notice is the player and I happen to know that is Hall of Famer Johnny Mize. But almost
as obvious in the tape stains. This card was probably pasted on a wall or scrapbook at some time. The tape probably came off easy with time; however it did leave heavy tape stains on
the card front. The centering is off, but not that bad. Most vintage cards are off center to some degree. There are no creases on this card. However the tape stains would bring the
card's grade down substantially. In referring back to the GRADING section of the SCD Catalog, I know that card is not as bad as POOR ("A card that has been tortured to death"), but in
reading the next grade up (FAIR) it reads: "evidence of having been taped or pasted." There is our card right there. However the card does not exhibit some of the other
characteristics of a FAIR card such as "heavy creases, minor writing, or missing small bits of paper." So could this card fit into a FAIR/GOOD (FR-GD) category? Possibly. For sure a
card with such heavy tape stains would grade no better than GOOD (GD). But being that this Mize card is much nicer than a FAIR (FR) card (in fact without the tape stains you could call
this card EX) you could call this either FAIR or FR-GD. It is slightly better than FAIR but not better than GOOD. As such I would grade this card FR-GD. To be conservative, you would
grade it as simply FAIR. So how much would the card be worth? Well the VG price for card #4 Johnny Mize is $27.50. It says under the GRADING section on page 14, that "FAIR cards
are valued at about 50% of Good. Good condition cards are valued at about 50% of the VG price. So there is our formula. Let's say we call the Mize card FAIR. So we take 50% of the
VG price ($27.50) and that will give us the GOOD price ($13.75). Fair cards are 50% of GOOD so that means our Mize is worth approx. $6.75. Now Mize is a Hall of Famer and like i said
it is possible to call it FR-GD. So to do that I would have to figure a price in-between FAIR and GOOD. So if my GD price is $13.75 and FR price is $6.75, the difference is exactly $7.
Divide that in half ($3.50) and add that to my FR price ($6.75). The total for my FR-GD Johnny Mize is now $10.25. Which to me seems very fair for this card.
Next, the card on the top right. It is Dodger great Pete Reiser, card #7 in the series. It also happens to be considered Reiser's rookie card AND it is a short printed card, which means
there were less cards of Reiser printed than other cards in the set. Centering is noticeably off especially the top border. There is just a tiny border at the top. Also notice the heavy
crease which runs horizontally through the card. It actually breaks the paper on the card surface. What would I grade it? Well a VG card by definition can have "no major creases."
"Centering can be as poor as 95/5." Yes we have the poor centering but we have a major crease, so the card could not be called a VG card. How about GD? "A well-worn card, but
exhibits no intentional damage or abuse. May have major or multiple creases and/or corners rounded well beyond the border." So I would grade this card as GOOD (GD). You could also
make a case for GD-VG but we will be conservative and stick with GOOD (GD). Value? Again, a GD card is valued at approx. 50% of the VG price. Looking at card #7 Pete Reiser in the
price guide I see that the VG price is $45. Half of that would be $22.50, so our Pete Reiser card is worth approx. $22.50. Why is the Reiser card worth more than the Johnny Mize card,
even though Mize is a Hall of Famer? Two letters: SP (Short print). The SCD Catalog makes a notation (SP) for short printed cards. Rookie cards are in italics.
Quickly I am going to grade the bottom two cards. The card on the lower left- GOOD (GD). However the card on the bottom right has a small hole and as such could be graded no higher
than POOR. POOR cards are easy to grade. Just remember "A card that has been tortured to death." If it has holes, rips, tears, bite marks, pieces missing, you have a POOR condition
card on your hands. I've seen worse.
Let's try another one:
Did this page help you at all? Suggestions? Comments? Send email to: nowbatting19@yahoo.com
1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan...NM???
I saw this card on eBay advertised as being "NM." Is it? What is important about grading is that a grade needs to be established to find a price. Are you comfortable calling this a NEAR
MINT (NM) card? A NM 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan lists for $45.00, while one in EX lists for $22.50. Would you be comfortable paying $45.00 (retail) for this card? If you know
something about grading you can save yourself some money. Just because a seller advertises a card as "NM" or even "MINT" (which is thrown about quite loosely considering most
vintage cards are rarely MINT to begin with) does not mean that the card is actually that grade. It could be lower (usually the case), it could be higher (once in a blue moon). Here is
another tip for you: GRADING IS SUBJECTIVE. It is debatable. So you have some leverage if you are knowledgeable. Let's get back to the card.
How did I know this is a 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan? Well, I am familiar with vintage cards, so I automatically know what each card year looks like. I know the 1972 Topps cards have a
"psychedelic look" to them. Ryan was also one of my favorites so I am plenty familiar with Nolan Ryan cards. But let's assume I wasn't. So I have this card and it says "Nolan Ryan." So I
turn the card over and I see the card number (#595). I also see the back has the "T.C.G." copyright so I know this is a TOPPS card (keep in mind that TOPPS was the major producer of
baseball cards from 1952 through 1980. So most vintage cards from the 1950's, 1960's, and 1970's are most likely TOPPS issues (there are some exceptions and we will touch on that
later). Ok so this is a Topps #595 Nolan Ryan card. What year is it? Well in reading the statistics, I see the last year of statistics is from the year 1971. Which means this is a 1972 Topps
card. I check my SCD Catalog and sure enough, under "TOPPS," "1972," we see that card #595 is "Nolan Ryan." Check. We have a 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan card. Values? NM
$45.00, EX $22.50, VG $13.50. Now we need to assign a grade. Do you feel this is a NM card as advertised? I don't. Again to simplify things I am going to grade the card based on the
front; assuming that the back is clean with no problems.
First thing I always notice is the picture. The image of Ryan is clear with no print problems. I do not see any creases. Next thing I see is the centering. The centering is very nice on this
card; the borders are very close all the way around. Upon closer inspection I see the card has a very slight "diamond" or "slant" cut. If you look at the borders on the left side of the card,
it appears the borders are slightly wider near the bottom and near the top they appear slightly narrower. Same on the right side, except reversed. The right side border is wider than the
bottom. This is called a "diamond cut" or "slant cut." Depending on the severity of the cut, it could be called "off-center" or worse, "miscut." In this case it is not that obvious (keep in mind
the image is much larger than the actual card) and you probably would not have realized this had I not mentioned it. Overall the centering is nice, but I WOULD mention to the seller that
the card has a slight diamond cut and as such I would try and negotiate a lower cost. Ok, now to the corners. At first glance, you may say the corners are NM, but upon closer inspection I
do not see the corners coming to sharp points. The tips appear slightly "fuzzy" and if you were to magnify the corners you would definitely SEE fuzziness. This is slight wear on the
corners. All four corners appear to have about the same amount of wear. Which is ok, but for a NEAR MINT card? We'll find out in a moment. Now there are two other "flaws" I detect on
this card. One is a tiny brown "blemish" near the top edge of the card, above the "A" in "Angels." I have marked it so you can see it. Also I notice a very small bit of paper missing in one of
the blue borders on the right side of the card. I have marked this one for you as well. Still think this is a NM card? Well let's read the definition of a NEAR MINT (NM) card according to the
Sports Collector's Digest Standard Catalog Of Baseball Cards. Again referring to my 2006 Edition, on page 14, under the heading "GRADING," a NM card is defined as:
"Near mint (NR MT or NM): At first glance, a Near Mint card appears perfect; upon closer inspection, however, a minor flaw will be discovered. On well-centered cards, at least
two of the four corners must be perfectly sharp; the others showing a minor imperfection upon close inspection. A slightly off-center card with one or more borders being
noticeably unequal - no worse than in a ratio of 70/30 S/S (side to side) or T/B (top to bottom) - would also fit this grade."
Ok, you may be asking, "what is this 70/30, 50/50 nonsense?" This refers to the centering ratio. A 50/50 ratio s/s means a card has even borders side to side. Each border is the same
size. A 50/50 s/s AND t/b would be a perfectly centered card, both side to side and top to bottom. A 70/30 s/s card would refer to a card that has 70% of it's border on one side, while only
30% on the other. There are ways to measure this but I won't get into that here. All you need to know is that a NM card needs to have centering no worse than 70/30. If it does, it can not
be considered a NM card. Our Ryan card has nice centering. Not perfect but it is nicer than 70/30. So do we have a NM card? How about the corners? According to the NM definition, "on
well-centered cards, at least two of the four corners must be perfectly sharp." Is this the case on our card? NO. All four of the corners exhibit slight wear. None are perfectly sharp.
So right away I know this card is less than NM condition. And we haven't even gotten to the slight blemish or small bit of missing paper! We learned earlier that a FAIR card can be
missing small bits of paper, though I do not think this Ryan is as bad as FAIR. It would be somewhere in-between FAIR and EXCELLENT. While the card does not have any creases, that
small bit of paper can significantly lower the grade. I think I good case could be made for VERY GOOD. There is a lot of leeway to grading this card. I know it is not as bad as FAIR as
there are no creases, the card has good centering, and the corners show slight to moderate wear. Not too bad. If not for the small bit of paper missing, even with the slight blemish, I
would call this card EXCELLENT (EX). However the paper loss would bring it down to VG. I would grade this card VG. So if the seller is asking $45 for this card, and you really want it,
what would you offer? I would point out to the seller that while the card is nice, I would not grade it NM. Point out the wear on the corners, slight slant cut, small blemish, and ESPECIALLY
the small bit of paper loss. This is the big flaw. I would say that the paper loss lowers the grade to no better than VG and as such you would be willing to pay the VG price $13.50, but that
you would not pay $45 for it. Why should you? If you are going to get a lower grade card, are you going to pay a higher grade price? Of course not! It's YOUR MONEY! You can
negotiate. You can say yes or no. The power is yours! Also keep in mind that the 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan card, while highly desirable, is by no means rare or hard to find. You can
find a NM copy quite easily. So if the seller tells you that you are crazy and to get lost, don't argue with him. Tell him thanks anyway, and find yourself another seller and card. That dealer
can go rip off someone else. Please note: I am not saying the seller of this card is a ripoff. He might not even have noticed the flaws I mentioned. In fact the seller of this card provided a
large scan so I don't believe he was hiding anything. But don't think there aren't sellers who will try and put one over on you. YOU now have the knowledge to determine for yourself
whether a card is worth the price or not. Also keep in mind that price guides are just that... GUIDES. You don't have to sell your cards for that price nor do you have to buy cards at those
prices. The price guides are just a guide. The trick is to buy cards at LESS than retail (what a dealer sells a card for). The cheaper you can get a card for the better for you when you
ever decide to sell it. Do you want to go buy a new car and pay full sticker price? Hell no. You want to negotiate. If they don't want to negotiate, find another dealer who will.
P.S: I really love this 1972 Topps Ryan card. Note the cheap airbrush job Topps did on his Angels cap. Also note the pinstripes on Ryan's jersey- a dead giveaway that Topps "artists"
airbrushed over a New York Mets cap (remember Ryan was traded in 1972 to the Angels from the New York Mets. This is Ryan's first card as a Halo.
Now, let's look at some higher grade cards.
MINT (NM) card? A NM 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan lists for $45.00, while one in EX lists for $22.50. Would you be comfortable paying $45.00 (retail) for this card? If you know
something about grading you can save yourself some money. Just because a seller advertises a card as "NM" or even "MINT" (which is thrown about quite loosely considering most
vintage cards are rarely MINT to begin with) does not mean that the card is actually that grade. It could be lower (usually the case), it could be higher (once in a blue moon). Here is
another tip for you: GRADING IS SUBJECTIVE. It is debatable. So you have some leverage if you are knowledgeable. Let's get back to the card.
How did I know this is a 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan? Well, I am familiar with vintage cards, so I automatically know what each card year looks like. I know the 1972 Topps cards have a
"psychedelic look" to them. Ryan was also one of my favorites so I am plenty familiar with Nolan Ryan cards. But let's assume I wasn't. So I have this card and it says "Nolan Ryan." So I
turn the card over and I see the card number (#595). I also see the back has the "T.C.G." copyright so I know this is a TOPPS card (keep in mind that TOPPS was the major producer of
baseball cards from 1952 through 1980. So most vintage cards from the 1950's, 1960's, and 1970's are most likely TOPPS issues (there are some exceptions and we will touch on that
later). Ok so this is a Topps #595 Nolan Ryan card. What year is it? Well in reading the statistics, I see the last year of statistics is from the year 1971. Which means this is a 1972 Topps
card. I check my SCD Catalog and sure enough, under "TOPPS," "1972," we see that card #595 is "Nolan Ryan." Check. We have a 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan card. Values? NM
$45.00, EX $22.50, VG $13.50. Now we need to assign a grade. Do you feel this is a NM card as advertised? I don't. Again to simplify things I am going to grade the card based on the
front; assuming that the back is clean with no problems.
First thing I always notice is the picture. The image of Ryan is clear with no print problems. I do not see any creases. Next thing I see is the centering. The centering is very nice on this
card; the borders are very close all the way around. Upon closer inspection I see the card has a very slight "diamond" or "slant" cut. If you look at the borders on the left side of the card,
it appears the borders are slightly wider near the bottom and near the top they appear slightly narrower. Same on the right side, except reversed. The right side border is wider than the
bottom. This is called a "diamond cut" or "slant cut." Depending on the severity of the cut, it could be called "off-center" or worse, "miscut." In this case it is not that obvious (keep in mind
the image is much larger than the actual card) and you probably would not have realized this had I not mentioned it. Overall the centering is nice, but I WOULD mention to the seller that
the card has a slight diamond cut and as such I would try and negotiate a lower cost. Ok, now to the corners. At first glance, you may say the corners are NM, but upon closer inspection I
do not see the corners coming to sharp points. The tips appear slightly "fuzzy" and if you were to magnify the corners you would definitely SEE fuzziness. This is slight wear on the
corners. All four corners appear to have about the same amount of wear. Which is ok, but for a NEAR MINT card? We'll find out in a moment. Now there are two other "flaws" I detect on
this card. One is a tiny brown "blemish" near the top edge of the card, above the "A" in "Angels." I have marked it so you can see it. Also I notice a very small bit of paper missing in one of
the blue borders on the right side of the card. I have marked this one for you as well. Still think this is a NM card? Well let's read the definition of a NEAR MINT (NM) card according to the
Sports Collector's Digest Standard Catalog Of Baseball Cards. Again referring to my 2006 Edition, on page 14, under the heading "GRADING," a NM card is defined as:
"Near mint (NR MT or NM): At first glance, a Near Mint card appears perfect; upon closer inspection, however, a minor flaw will be discovered. On well-centered cards, at least
two of the four corners must be perfectly sharp; the others showing a minor imperfection upon close inspection. A slightly off-center card with one or more borders being
noticeably unequal - no worse than in a ratio of 70/30 S/S (side to side) or T/B (top to bottom) - would also fit this grade."
Ok, you may be asking, "what is this 70/30, 50/50 nonsense?" This refers to the centering ratio. A 50/50 ratio s/s means a card has even borders side to side. Each border is the same
size. A 50/50 s/s AND t/b would be a perfectly centered card, both side to side and top to bottom. A 70/30 s/s card would refer to a card that has 70% of it's border on one side, while only
30% on the other. There are ways to measure this but I won't get into that here. All you need to know is that a NM card needs to have centering no worse than 70/30. If it does, it can not
be considered a NM card. Our Ryan card has nice centering. Not perfect but it is nicer than 70/30. So do we have a NM card? How about the corners? According to the NM definition, "on
well-centered cards, at least two of the four corners must be perfectly sharp." Is this the case on our card? NO. All four of the corners exhibit slight wear. None are perfectly sharp.
So right away I know this card is less than NM condition. And we haven't even gotten to the slight blemish or small bit of missing paper! We learned earlier that a FAIR card can be
missing small bits of paper, though I do not think this Ryan is as bad as FAIR. It would be somewhere in-between FAIR and EXCELLENT. While the card does not have any creases, that
small bit of paper can significantly lower the grade. I think I good case could be made for VERY GOOD. There is a lot of leeway to grading this card. I know it is not as bad as FAIR as
there are no creases, the card has good centering, and the corners show slight to moderate wear. Not too bad. If not for the small bit of paper missing, even with the slight blemish, I
would call this card EXCELLENT (EX). However the paper loss would bring it down to VG. I would grade this card VG. So if the seller is asking $45 for this card, and you really want it,
what would you offer? I would point out to the seller that while the card is nice, I would not grade it NM. Point out the wear on the corners, slight slant cut, small blemish, and ESPECIALLY
the small bit of paper loss. This is the big flaw. I would say that the paper loss lowers the grade to no better than VG and as such you would be willing to pay the VG price $13.50, but that
you would not pay $45 for it. Why should you? If you are going to get a lower grade card, are you going to pay a higher grade price? Of course not! It's YOUR MONEY! You can
negotiate. You can say yes or no. The power is yours! Also keep in mind that the 1972 Topps #595 Nolan Ryan card, while highly desirable, is by no means rare or hard to find. You can
find a NM copy quite easily. So if the seller tells you that you are crazy and to get lost, don't argue with him. Tell him thanks anyway, and find yourself another seller and card. That dealer
can go rip off someone else. Please note: I am not saying the seller of this card is a ripoff. He might not even have noticed the flaws I mentioned. In fact the seller of this card provided a
large scan so I don't believe he was hiding anything. But don't think there aren't sellers who will try and put one over on you. YOU now have the knowledge to determine for yourself
whether a card is worth the price or not. Also keep in mind that price guides are just that... GUIDES. You don't have to sell your cards for that price nor do you have to buy cards at those
prices. The price guides are just a guide. The trick is to buy cards at LESS than retail (what a dealer sells a card for). The cheaper you can get a card for the better for you when you
ever decide to sell it. Do you want to go buy a new car and pay full sticker price? Hell no. You want to negotiate. If they don't want to negotiate, find another dealer who will.
P.S: I really love this 1972 Topps Ryan card. Note the cheap airbrush job Topps did on his Angels cap. Also note the pinstripes on Ryan's jersey- a dead giveaway that Topps "artists"
airbrushed over a New York Mets cap (remember Ryan was traded in 1972 to the Angels from the New York Mets. This is Ryan's first card as a Halo.
Now, let's look at some higher grade cards.
Blemish or slight stain>>>>>
<<<<<<< Tiny spot of paper missing
Ok, see if you can find out #1) who made this card, and #2) what grade is it? Let's start from scratch. Ok, so I turn the card over to the back side. I see "TOPPS" right above the card
number (103) in the top left corner. Also in the bottom right, underneath the statistics, I see "T.C.G. PRINTED IN U.S.A." So what card do I have here? TOPPS. What year was the card
made? Ok, Iook at the last year of statistics, and the last year is 1965. So this is a 1966 Topps card. Remember Topps produces their cards before baseball season, the following year.
So what I have here is a 1966 (year) Topps (manufacturer) #103 (card number in set) Dick Groat (player). 1966 Topps #103 DIck Groat. Now let's assign a grade. At first glance, this
card looks almost perfect. The centering is very nice, corners are sharp and so is the picture. Same on the back. No creases or major flaws that I can see. This card is a beauty! MINT
perhaps? Remember a vintage card is seldom MINT, even right out of a pack. So let's check out the card a bit more carefully. Looking at the front of the card, I see the card has a very
slight "slant" or "diamond" cut. Notice the left and right borders near the top of the card are almost the same, while near the bottom the right border appears larger than the left border. So
it does have a slight "slant" cut, but remember this is an enlarged image and it is easier to detect smaller flaws. The centering on the back is near perfect. What stands out to me is how
"clean" the card appears. The white borders really stand out, especially on the back. This card has not been handled much. Corners come to points, but on very close inspection I see
there is a slight "touch" of wear on the upper left corner. You really can't detect it on my scan. But in holding the card closely with good light, I can see it with the naked eye. So, is this
card MINT? Let's see what the definition for a MINT card is according to the SCD Catalog. "Mint (MT): A perfect card." While the catalog does go into more detail, essentially the ONLY
flaw this card can have is being off-centered no worse than 60-40 side to side and top to bottom. Perfectly square corners, no print problems or defects, even if right out of a pack. This
card has minimal problems; only the very slight slant cut and the tiny bit of wear on the top left corner. So I am not going to call this card MINT. However, the card is a good candidate for
Near Mint/Mint (NM/M or NM-MT):
"A nearly perfect card. Well-centered, with at least three sharp, square corners....Generally, to be considered in NM/M condition, a card's borders must exist in a ratio
of no greater than 65/35 side to side and top to bottom."
That seems to fit our card to a "T." So I would grade this card as being NM-MT. Some dealers or collectors may call this card "MINT," but like I said, it is more likely a card right out of the
pack will be anywhere from EX (because of centering issues) to NM/MT at best. Also I tend to be a bit more conservative on the grading and I will rarely call a vintage ungraded card
"MINT." It's safer to say the card is NM-MT or even "NM-MT+" just to be safe. And I have yet to have a card returned because of over-grading. I don't like to be disappointed when I
receive a card and neither do you. When you get a MINT card, that card better be MINT. I have seen "MINT" cards graded by reputable grading services (see my PSA SUCKS PAGE!) and
I would not grade them that high. But also remember that I said that grading is subjective. Even though there is a grading scale, not everyone is going to agree on a cards grade. I called
the card above "NM-MT" while another collector might call it "MINT" or "NM." Grading services were supposed to eliminate this but they have just caused as much confusion as before in
my opinion. But I am not going to talk about professional grading services here. For more on that you can go to the WE GRADE THEM PAGE, where we grade the professional grading
services.
Let's get back to the card. Now how much is this card worth? So I go back to the SCD Catalog, look under "TOPPS," "1966," and find the card number (103). Sure enough, card #103 is
DIck Groat. However the catalog lists two different Dick Groat cards. One is listed as "no trade statement," while the other has "with trade statement." This is called a "variation."
Sometimes a card manufacturer will make mistakes or corrections during the printing process. Sometimes all the cards are corrected and sometimes not. In 1966, Topps printed some
cards with a statement that the player was traded and some of the cards were printed this way (common) while others did not have the trade statement (scarce). Hence the scarcer cards
will be more expensive. For instance, card #103a Dick Groat (no trade statement) lists in NM for $20, EX $10, and VG $6, while card #103b (with trade statement) lists at NM $4, EX $2,
and VG $1.25. So I look at the back of the card and there is NO trade statement, so I have the more expensive variation. But my card is NM/MT. So this is worth more than the $20 for a
NM card. How do I determine it's value? This is where it gets a bit tricky. I know that the card is worth at least $20. But the price guide does not provide prices for vintage cards that are in
better than NM condition. So what this means is this. You can sell the card for really what you want for it. Of course if you ask something outrageous, say $500, you are not going to sell it.
Your best bet is to see what dealers are asking for similar cards. What I use is eBay. I will do an "advanced search" and type in a card under "completed" auctions or sales. This will give
you good idea of what your card is selling for. So I go to eBay, go to "Advanced Search," type in the search box "1966 Topps variation" and check the "Completed" box. I get one "hit." A
Topps 1966 #62 Merritt Ranew No Trade VARIATION. It did NOT sell for even $1.99. The reason it did not sell was the card was in lower grade, plus the seller wanted $6 to ship the card.
So you would be paying essentially $8 ($2 + $6 shipping) for a card that lists in the Catalog for $6 in VG condition (seller described the card as being in "fair to good" condition). A dealer
may be asking even more but that is why he or she may have the card unsold months later. So that does not really help me. So I am just going to hang onto this card until I find a similar
example and how much it sells for. I do know at the VERY LEAST I would want $20 for it. But that is my decision. You can decide to ask $50 for it and you may or may not get it. A card is
really worth "whatever someone is willing to pay for it." Price guides are just that. They give you an "idea" about what a card is worth. Of course they cannot list every price for every grade
scale. That would be an undertaking greater than the Holy Bible. Let's try another one:
number (103) in the top left corner. Also in the bottom right, underneath the statistics, I see "T.C.G. PRINTED IN U.S.A." So what card do I have here? TOPPS. What year was the card
made? Ok, Iook at the last year of statistics, and the last year is 1965. So this is a 1966 Topps card. Remember Topps produces their cards before baseball season, the following year.
So what I have here is a 1966 (year) Topps (manufacturer) #103 (card number in set) Dick Groat (player). 1966 Topps #103 DIck Groat. Now let's assign a grade. At first glance, this
card looks almost perfect. The centering is very nice, corners are sharp and so is the picture. Same on the back. No creases or major flaws that I can see. This card is a beauty! MINT
perhaps? Remember a vintage card is seldom MINT, even right out of a pack. So let's check out the card a bit more carefully. Looking at the front of the card, I see the card has a very
slight "slant" or "diamond" cut. Notice the left and right borders near the top of the card are almost the same, while near the bottom the right border appears larger than the left border. So
it does have a slight "slant" cut, but remember this is an enlarged image and it is easier to detect smaller flaws. The centering on the back is near perfect. What stands out to me is how
"clean" the card appears. The white borders really stand out, especially on the back. This card has not been handled much. Corners come to points, but on very close inspection I see
there is a slight "touch" of wear on the upper left corner. You really can't detect it on my scan. But in holding the card closely with good light, I can see it with the naked eye. So, is this
card MINT? Let's see what the definition for a MINT card is according to the SCD Catalog. "Mint (MT): A perfect card." While the catalog does go into more detail, essentially the ONLY
flaw this card can have is being off-centered no worse than 60-40 side to side and top to bottom. Perfectly square corners, no print problems or defects, even if right out of a pack. This
card has minimal problems; only the very slight slant cut and the tiny bit of wear on the top left corner. So I am not going to call this card MINT. However, the card is a good candidate for
Near Mint/Mint (NM/M or NM-MT):
"A nearly perfect card. Well-centered, with at least three sharp, square corners....Generally, to be considered in NM/M condition, a card's borders must exist in a ratio
of no greater than 65/35 side to side and top to bottom."
That seems to fit our card to a "T." So I would grade this card as being NM-MT. Some dealers or collectors may call this card "MINT," but like I said, it is more likely a card right out of the
pack will be anywhere from EX (because of centering issues) to NM/MT at best. Also I tend to be a bit more conservative on the grading and I will rarely call a vintage ungraded card
"MINT." It's safer to say the card is NM-MT or even "NM-MT+" just to be safe. And I have yet to have a card returned because of over-grading. I don't like to be disappointed when I
receive a card and neither do you. When you get a MINT card, that card better be MINT. I have seen "MINT" cards graded by reputable grading services (see my PSA SUCKS PAGE!) and
I would not grade them that high. But also remember that I said that grading is subjective. Even though there is a grading scale, not everyone is going to agree on a cards grade. I called
the card above "NM-MT" while another collector might call it "MINT" or "NM." Grading services were supposed to eliminate this but they have just caused as much confusion as before in
my opinion. But I am not going to talk about professional grading services here. For more on that you can go to the WE GRADE THEM PAGE, where we grade the professional grading
services.
Let's get back to the card. Now how much is this card worth? So I go back to the SCD Catalog, look under "TOPPS," "1966," and find the card number (103). Sure enough, card #103 is
DIck Groat. However the catalog lists two different Dick Groat cards. One is listed as "no trade statement," while the other has "with trade statement." This is called a "variation."
Sometimes a card manufacturer will make mistakes or corrections during the printing process. Sometimes all the cards are corrected and sometimes not. In 1966, Topps printed some
cards with a statement that the player was traded and some of the cards were printed this way (common) while others did not have the trade statement (scarce). Hence the scarcer cards
will be more expensive. For instance, card #103a Dick Groat (no trade statement) lists in NM for $20, EX $10, and VG $6, while card #103b (with trade statement) lists at NM $4, EX $2,
and VG $1.25. So I look at the back of the card and there is NO trade statement, so I have the more expensive variation. But my card is NM/MT. So this is worth more than the $20 for a
NM card. How do I determine it's value? This is where it gets a bit tricky. I know that the card is worth at least $20. But the price guide does not provide prices for vintage cards that are in
better than NM condition. So what this means is this. You can sell the card for really what you want for it. Of course if you ask something outrageous, say $500, you are not going to sell it.
Your best bet is to see what dealers are asking for similar cards. What I use is eBay. I will do an "advanced search" and type in a card under "completed" auctions or sales. This will give
you good idea of what your card is selling for. So I go to eBay, go to "Advanced Search," type in the search box "1966 Topps variation" and check the "Completed" box. I get one "hit." A
Topps 1966 #62 Merritt Ranew No Trade VARIATION. It did NOT sell for even $1.99. The reason it did not sell was the card was in lower grade, plus the seller wanted $6 to ship the card.
So you would be paying essentially $8 ($2 + $6 shipping) for a card that lists in the Catalog for $6 in VG condition (seller described the card as being in "fair to good" condition). A dealer
may be asking even more but that is why he or she may have the card unsold months later. So that does not really help me. So I am just going to hang onto this card until I find a similar
example and how much it sells for. I do know at the VERY LEAST I would want $20 for it. But that is my decision. You can decide to ask $50 for it and you may or may not get it. A card is
really worth "whatever someone is willing to pay for it." Price guides are just that. They give you an "idea" about what a card is worth. Of course they cannot list every price for every grade
scale. That would be an undertaking greater than the Holy Bible. Let's try another one:
Here is a really sharp looking card featuring Billy "The Kid" Martin. So I flip the card over and I see on the bottom it reads "CARD #453," and also a copyright "SSPC 1975." NOTE:
The number "1" at the top left of the card is the player's uniform number in this set. So what do we have here? While these cards were printed in 1975, they were actually issued in
1976. But they are listed in the SCD Catalog as being "1975 SSPC" cards. SSPC stands for "Sport Star Publishing Company." They are commonly referred to as "SSPC." So we
have here a 1975 SSPC #453 Billy Martin. Grade? The picture is beautiful. Snow white borders that look to be even side to side (s/s) and top to bottom (t/b). Corners come to
sharp points. No print defects, creases, stains, etc. Back is clean and nicely centered as well. Now this card is a strong candidate for MINT. Even close up, I see no flaws in this card
and remember a true MINT card is essentially "A perfect card." This card appears like it was just printed from the factory. So while I feel this is a MINT card, just to be safe I could call
it "NM-MT" or even better, "NM-MT+." Value? Well, again, the SCD Catalog only prices vintage cards (pre-1981) in grades NM, EX, and VG. In Near Mint condition, this card lists for
.25 (2006 SCD Catalog). But I would have no problem asking at least a buck for this card. Common, a vintage card of Billy Martin in MINT condition for a buck? Are you kidding me?
However I do know these cards are commonly found in high grades. You can find high graded examples on eBay quite easily and they sell for CHEAP!!!
Side note: The 1975 SSPC set is a terrific set! Many stars of the day are featured (Pete Rose, Nolan Ryan, Carl Yastrzemski, etc.), including "rookie" cards of George Brett and
Robin Yount. These are much cheaper than their 1975 Topps counterparts. So if you want to collect a vintage 1970's set, you might want to look into the 1975 SSPC issue.
The number "1" at the top left of the card is the player's uniform number in this set. So what do we have here? While these cards were printed in 1975, they were actually issued in
1976. But they are listed in the SCD Catalog as being "1975 SSPC" cards. SSPC stands for "Sport Star Publishing Company." They are commonly referred to as "SSPC." So we
have here a 1975 SSPC #453 Billy Martin. Grade? The picture is beautiful. Snow white borders that look to be even side to side (s/s) and top to bottom (t/b). Corners come to
sharp points. No print defects, creases, stains, etc. Back is clean and nicely centered as well. Now this card is a strong candidate for MINT. Even close up, I see no flaws in this card
and remember a true MINT card is essentially "A perfect card." This card appears like it was just printed from the factory. So while I feel this is a MINT card, just to be safe I could call
it "NM-MT" or even better, "NM-MT+." Value? Well, again, the SCD Catalog only prices vintage cards (pre-1981) in grades NM, EX, and VG. In Near Mint condition, this card lists for
.25 (2006 SCD Catalog). But I would have no problem asking at least a buck for this card. Common, a vintage card of Billy Martin in MINT condition for a buck? Are you kidding me?
However I do know these cards are commonly found in high grades. You can find high graded examples on eBay quite easily and they sell for CHEAP!!!
Side note: The 1975 SSPC set is a terrific set! Many stars of the day are featured (Pete Rose, Nolan Ryan, Carl Yastrzemski, etc.), including "rookie" cards of George Brett and
Robin Yount. These are much cheaper than their 1975 Topps counterparts. So if you want to collect a vintage 1970's set, you might want to look into the 1975 SSPC issue.
SUMMARY - You CAN grade your own cards! This is important as a grade needs to be assigned so that a price can be determined when buying or selling a card. Most vintage cards
are commonly found in grades of NM, EX, and VG. There are also in-between grades (VG-EX, EX-MT, etc,) that can be used to further define a card's grade. Most vintage cards are
rarely found in true MINT condition, even right out of a pack! There are many resources available including publications by Beckett's and Sports Collector's Digest. Grading cards
takes some practice, but once you get the hang of it, it is fun and you can save yourself a lot of money by doing it yourself. Look through the many pages on my site and practice
your grading skills, or better yet, go through your collection and start grading!
USE PROTECTION! It is important to keep your cards in the condition they are in, especially if they are valuable. The higher the condition, the higher the price. So if you have a NM
1963 Topps #200 Mickey Mantle, you would not want to be handling it with out some kind of protective holder. There are many protective sleeves and pages to protect your cards
from any further damage. I'll never forget the time I was trading with this kid and he was stealing cards from me and putting them in his sock. Guess what that does to cards. It bends
them and gives them creases, edge & corner wear, etc. Not to mention stinking up my cards. These card holders are very inexpensive. There are also special pages to put cards in
so that you can put them in binders. This is a convenient way to look through your collection. You can buy these supplies at a local card shop or show, online, etc. See pics below for
examples:
are commonly found in grades of NM, EX, and VG. There are also in-between grades (VG-EX, EX-MT, etc,) that can be used to further define a card's grade. Most vintage cards are
rarely found in true MINT condition, even right out of a pack! There are many resources available including publications by Beckett's and Sports Collector's Digest. Grading cards
takes some practice, but once you get the hang of it, it is fun and you can save yourself a lot of money by doing it yourself. Look through the many pages on my site and practice
your grading skills, or better yet, go through your collection and start grading!
USE PROTECTION! It is important to keep your cards in the condition they are in, especially if they are valuable. The higher the condition, the higher the price. So if you have a NM
1963 Topps #200 Mickey Mantle, you would not want to be handling it with out some kind of protective holder. There are many protective sleeves and pages to protect your cards
from any further damage. I'll never forget the time I was trading with this kid and he was stealing cards from me and putting them in his sock. Guess what that does to cards. It bends
them and gives them creases, edge & corner wear, etc. Not to mention stinking up my cards. These card holders are very inexpensive. There are also special pages to put cards in
so that you can put them in binders. This is a convenient way to look through your collection. You can buy these supplies at a local card shop or show, online, etc. See pics below for
examples:
